Search found 6 matches
- Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:04 pm
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: [Feature Request] iPhone App, cache data
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2885
Re: [Feature Request] iPhone App, cache data
Locally caching already-downloaded notifications is a likely future feature... This would be great. I'm not sure how others use Prowl, but I usually don't delete my messages until after a long while. So re-downloading all the messages on every launch can get slow (O(n^2)) after several messages. On...
- Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:52 pm
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: [Feature Request] Redirect to custom URL
- Replies: 17
- Views: 14797
Re: [Feature Request] Redirect to custom URL
Awesome! I'm not sure how you are planning on implementing this, but it would be great if the custom URL could be sent in the API as a separate parameter altogether (like "redirectURL" or something). That way, we could put the necessary meta-data into the URL itself and not have to embed i...
- Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:18 pm
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: Real-time Twitter DM push
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2822
Real-time Twitter DM push
Hi All, If you're like me and don't have unlimited text SMS on your phone plan, you may have disabled Twitter DMs as text messages. I've been using Prowl to send DMs to my iphone as push notifications for a while now. In a fit of insomnia I decided to make this system more generally available for pe...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:16 pm
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: Irssi Prowl Script
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3438
Re: Irssi Prowl Script
This is brilliant. Very nice 

- Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:11 pm
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: API Changes
- Replies: 48
- Views: 189163
Re: Third-party API (RFC)
Can I ask from a technical point of view what the advantages of using cURL are over using fopen (see my code above for an example). the fopen negotiates the https with out any problems at all. Am I missing something? If the API changes to using POST (yes, please) to add messages, then fopen won't w...
- Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:24 am
- Forum: Prowl
- Topic: API Changes
- Replies: 48
- Views: 189163
Re: Third-party API (RFC)
Might want to mention that these are GET parameters, though I would argue that they should be sent as POST vars.