Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:48 am
NOoooOoo, the secret is out!evands wrote:we natively support Proteus emoticon packs and nobody knows it?
Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:43 am
Click on the duck in the Get Info… dialog…
It squaks and then quacks every 5 or something.
Pressing option while in the Get Info… dialog makes the scrolling go backward
Uselessness!
It squaks and then quacks every 5 or something.
Pressing option while in the Get Info… dialog makes the scrolling go backward
Uselessness!
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:48 am
I think if Adium wants to compete in today's software market, it needs more secret functions like the popular applications "Real Player" and "Kazaa." For example, Adium could secretly send a copy of your friend's email addresses to the Adium developers-- for safe keeping in case of a crash. Similarly, Adium could back up your conversation logs in a centralized server.
Another good function would be, if NO KEY was held down on launch, Adium would look through keychain, find your credit card number and transfer $1,000 to the devs, so as to improve the next version of Adium. Can't we all agree that Adium would be much better if it had been created on Gold Plated G5s with Diamond insets?
Another good function would be, if NO KEY was held down on launch, Adium would look through keychain, find your credit card number and transfer $1,000 to the devs, so as to improve the next version of Adium. Can't we all agree that Adium would be much better if it had been created on Gold Plated G5s with Diamond insets?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:13 am
If I got any _more_ email addresses because of Adium, Mail.app would explodecarlj7 wrote:I think if Adium wants to compete in today's software market, it needs more secret functions like the popular applications "Real Player" and "Kazaa." For example, Adium could secretly send a copy of your friend's email addresses to the Adium developers-- for safe keeping in case of a crash. Similarly, Adium could back up your conversation logs in a centralized server.
I certainly can. Please code and submit a patch to enable this behavior... it'd speed development 5,400,394 fold, according to current calculations by the resident advanced math geeks.Can't we all agree that Adium would be much better if it had been created on Gold Plated G5s with Diamond insets?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:41 am
Uh, oh! But…evands wrote:If I got any _more_ email addresses because of Adium, Mail.app would explodecarlj7 wrote:I think if Adium wants to compete in today's software market, it needs more secret functions like the popular applications "Real Player" and "Kazaa." For example, Adium could secretly send a copy of your friend's email addresses to the Adium developers-- for safe keeping in case of a crash. Similarly, Adium could back up your conversation logs in a centralized server.
I certainly can. Please code and submit a patch to enable this behavior... it'd speed development 5,400,394 fold, according to current calculations by the resident advanced math geeks.Can't we all agree that Adium would be much better if it had been created on Gold Plated G5s with Diamond insets?
GPL stops you from doing that! That's like charging for the program, and it's against GPL…
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:56 am
Actually, you can charge for gpl software. For the distribution of the software specifically, I do believe.zaudragon wrote:Uh, oh! But…evands wrote:If I got any _more_ email addresses because of Adium, Mail.app would explodecarlj7 wrote:I think if Adium wants to compete in today's software market, it needs more secret functions like the popular applications "Real Player" and "Kazaa." For example, Adium could secretly send a copy of your friend's email addresses to the Adium developers-- for safe keeping in case of a crash. Similarly, Adium could back up your conversation logs in a centralized server.
I certainly can. Please code and submit a patch to enable this behavior... it'd speed development 5,400,394 fold, according to current calculations by the resident advanced math geeks.Can't we all agree that Adium would be much better if it had been created on Gold Plated G5s with Diamond insets?
GPL stops you from doing that! That's like charging for the program, and it's against GPL…
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:45 pm
My understanding is that you can charge for distribution and for support, but the source to the program has to be remain available free of charge (and I think the moral way to understand that is that you can't charge for source code distribution, either).The_Tick wrote:Actually, you can charge for gpl software. For the distribution of the software specifically, I do believe.zaudragon wrote:Uh, oh! But…evands wrote: If I got any _more_ email addresses because of Adium, Mail.app would explode
I certainly can. Please code and submit a patch to enable this behavior... it'd speed development 5,400,394 fold, according to current calculations by the resident advanced math geeks.
GPL stops you from doing that! That's like charging for the program, and it's against GPL…
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:06 pm
Yeah, looks that way. Check out the GPL FAQ. FYI.evands wrote:My understanding is that you can charge for distribution and for support, but the source to the program has to be remain available free of charge (and I think the moral way to understand that is that you can't charge for source code distribution, either).
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:15 pm
That would be one of mine, as well. I've heard that this was going to be dropped. I kindly request that the devs refrain from doing this for as long as possible (as long as it does not negatively affect another feature), as it is very useful.Tipo 61 wrote:hmm, Mine would have to be holding down 'option' during startup, to choose which user you are
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 10:39 pm
The only reason it'd be removed is to simply the path to the preferences... which I think is a bit of an unnecessary thing to worry about. Wouldn't expect to see it go away any time soonlordoftheoats wrote:That would be one of mine, as well. I've heard that this was going to be dropped. I kindly request that the devs refrain from doing this for as long as possible (as long as it does not negatively affect another feature), as it is very useful.Tipo 61 wrote:hmm, Mine would have to be holding down 'option' during startup, to choose which user you are
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:14 pm
Yayevands wrote: The only reason it'd be removed is to simply the path to the preferences... which I think is a bit of an unnecessary thing to worry about. Wouldn't expect to see it go away any time soon
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:26 pm
Awesome stuff. Thanks again for all the work you guys have done.evands wrote:Wouldn't expect to see it go away any time soon
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:29 am
In addition to other LaTeX coolness, I'm also a fan of being able to click on the equation after sending it to make it turn back into text.
...and I'm a ctl-s person, myself.
...and I'm a ctl-s person, myself.
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:48 am
You can do the same thing with emoticons.Perez wrote:In addition to other LaTeX coolness, I'm also a fan of being able to click on the equation after sending it to make it turn back into text.
...and I'm a ctl-s person, myself.
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:47 am
freakman just found that by clicking everywhereshurmanter wrote:You can do the same thing with emoticons.Perez wrote:In addition to other LaTeX coolness, I'm also a fan of being able to click on the equation after sending it to make it turn back into text.
...and I'm a ctl-s person, myself.
He found it a while back… January?