cocoaforge

I also know Ontario and Quebec, the 2 most populated provinces of Canada, use MSN prevalently.

Not sure about the rest of Canada, but I believe it's pretty much mainly MSN in Canada.


Finally having Personal Messages (status messages) support is nice, but I think Offline Messages is as important, if not more important. The fact that someone sent you an offline message (perhaps something important) and you did not receive it (and worse, you don't know that you didn't receive it) is terrible IMO.

remain wrote:I also know Ontario and Quebec, the 2 most populated provinces of Canada, use MSN prevalently.

Not sure about the rest of Canada, but I believe it's pretty much mainly MSN in Canada.

In British Columbia, Alberta, and Manitoba it's also MSN-dominated.

remain wrote:I also know Ontario and Quebec, the 2 most populated provinces of Canada, use MSN prevalently.

Not sure about the rest of Canada, but I believe it's pretty much mainly MSN in Canada.


Finally having Personal Messages (status messages) support is nice, but I think Offline Messages is as important, if not more important. The fact that someone sent you an offline message (perhaps something important) and you did not receive it (and worse, you don't know that you didn't receive it) is terrible IMO.

People have been requesting personal messages for a lot longer than offline messaging.

neckaros wrote:i only hope that "we" will be more considered in the future.

What exactly do you mean by this? Because last time I checked, none of the devs really use msn full time, they only use it to test msn functionality in adium, so the fact that it's being updated means that the end user is being considered now.

The fact that the devs are not switching to Yet Another Library mid beta is also considering the end user now because it means not redoing the entire beta for a few features.

The_Tick wrote:

neckaros wrote:i only hope that "we" will be more considered in the future.

What exactly do you mean by this? Because last time I checked, none of the devs really use msn full time, they only use it to test msn functionality in adium, so the fact that it's being updated means that the end user is being considered now.

The fact that the devs are not switching to Yet Another Library mid beta is also considering the end user now because it means not redoing the entire beta for a few features.

I only put we in brackets because i wanted to mean all users of MSN (as it is used in my language, sorry if it is not in english)
And for the "considered" in the future because i tought (maybe i'm wrong) that i read on the blog a while back that MSN wasn't a priority. And maybe it is the reason why it use such an old protocol as compare to other IM software.
But i'm only a simple end user that love Adium and i know close to nothing about LibPurple and i surely don't want to irk anybody.

Can I block a contact?

Somehow they still see me and talk to me..

punkstar31 wrote:Can I block a contact?

Somehow they still see me and talk to me..

You could try logging in at http://www.meebo.com and block the contact there. Then he should be also blocked when you use Adium.

This needs testing, if it's a bug or not (I say it probably is)
You should test if you're able to block/unblock, and report your findings here (you= any/all of you) and also specify what msn-client the party you're trying to block is using...
and ONLY test/report if you are using dimmuxx's newest build (should say "1.3b7-2434" or higher, in the "about Adium" window) report your ordinary adium beta msn-pecan issues ELSEWHERE please

SLMalling wrote:This needs testing, if it's a bug or not (I say it probably is)
You should test if you're able to block/unblock, and report your findings here (you= any/all of you) and also specify what msn-client the party you're trying to block is using...
and ONLY test/report if you are using dimmuxx's newest build (should say "1.3b7-2434" or higher, in the "about Adium" window) report your ordinary adium beta msn-pecan issues ELSEWHERE please

Yepp, and be sure to have a debug log which shows what happens too.

Hi.

When can we expect a new update?

Or is it now better to use the 'official' Adium beta?

punkstar31 wrote:Hi.

When can we expect a new update?

Or is it now better to use the 'official' Adium beta?

In the later part of next week or early in the week after that.

B9 have some bugs and is mostly msnp12 fixes and some memory leaks removed so that's up to you to decide. The only important msnp15 fix since last build is a really rare OIM bug that crashes Adium when you try to recieve OIMs.

i done a stupid testing ...i found that adiumx beta6 with msnp15 is most stable

008325 wrote:i done a stupid testing ...i found that adiumx beta6 with msnp15 is most stable

What do you mean?

Dimmuxx wrote:

008325 wrote:i done a stupid testing ...i found that adiumx beta6 with msnp15 is most stable

What do you mean?

when i am using beta6 , it never quite , cutline , etc , i am quite satisfied with this version.

i tried b7 , but it quit unexpected every few hours .....

so i am using B6 now

008325 wrote: when i am using beta6 , it never quite , cutline , etc , i am quite satisfied with this version.

i tried b7 , but it quit unexpected every few hours .....

so i am using B6 now

Using B6 is not recommended since it has a lot of msn bugs and one really bad xmpp bug.

thank you for your imformation , but it still better than "Quit Unexpected"

008325 wrote:thank you for your imformation , but it still better than "Quit Unexpected"

Does it crash or what happens? crash & debug log would be good to have. It might be the rare OIM bug or some Adium specific bug.

24645 is out so download it since it should fix a lot of crashes.

Dimmuxx wrote:24645 is out so download it since it should fix a lot of crashes.

Hmm.. I can't see status messages anymore with this build..

Zelgadis wrote:Hmm.. I can't see status messages anymore with this build..

Probably this bug then http://trac.adiumx.com/ticket/10611.