Page 1 of 1
Growl about logging changes?
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 11:53 pm
by darmok
How do I make Growl growl (and log the event) about changes in its logging?
Thx,
- Dan.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 2:18 am
by The_Tick
You cannot.
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 5:07 am
by darmok
Perhaps it would be good to add this.
Right now growling just ends with no reason. Someone trying to put together a sequence of events will have no pointer sending him to the next log.
- Dan.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:36 pm
by bgannin
Could you please elaborate on what scenario/usage you feel needs addressed?
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:31 pm
by darmok
Two main uses: System/app failure determination and Forensics.
As more apps use Growl, I think the importance of the growl's logs rises. Some apps are sending events to Growl that they previously didn't log at all. Some apps are sending events to Growl that they previously sent to console.
By cross referencing system, console, growl, and app logs, you can determine a really good post-mortom chain of events. Even if the user edited a log or three, the discrepency between the logs will point that out.
log-start, log-continued-to, and log-end type entries make rebuilding the chain much easier...
- Dan.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:59 pm
by The_Tick
Hmm..
Brian, based on your change yesterday, we're basically disabling logging unless someone throws a defaults command right?
Darmok, since the logging will basically be hidden from now on, if you'd like to send in a patch to improve the logging however you want I do not see a problem with that.
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 7:50 am
by bgannin
Correct.