zaudragon wrote:nitrox wrote:yes, it can.. but im trying to teach the correct way to do things

What's the difference?
The difference is in the actual meaning ("semantics") of the tag, not in its appearance. I have a feeling you suggested <b> because you like to talk, but ironically enough, <b> is more correct here
Both render in boldface type, but "strong" implies that you want to mark the text as being strongly emphasized, as in, "
Do not use the popcorn button on your microwave for best results." There are other places where boldface type is used, like in a list of definitions, and there are semantic tags for some of those situations as well.
In this case, there's no <screenname> tag, but that doesn't mean you should use <strong>, because you're not trying to forcefully declare the person's screen name or anything. Maybe something like <cite> would be
most appropriate, but I'm not sure if you can CSS that into boldface with a free LiveJournal account. In any event, a nonsemantic tag like <b> is better than the
wrong semantic tag.
Not that any of this is a huge deal for a LiveJournal page that probably isn't using semantic markup to begin with, but I like to talk, too
