For values of "hot" equal to "bloated", yes, I agree.Rita wrote: Of course, what would be really hot (and probably a pain in the butt to create) is one with a default to always ask, an option to turn it off, and an advanced pref. pane to set it up so that you personalize when to ask...never, if an unread message is open, if a chat is open, or always.
apple+q
- Catfish_Man
- Cocoaforge Admin
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:30 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- Contact:
- TheSilverFox06
- Grandé
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:16 pm
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Catfish_Man wrote:For values of "hot" equal to "bloated", yes, I agree.Rita wrote: Of course, what would be really hot (and probably a pain in the butt to create) is one with a default to always ask, an option to turn it off, and an advanced pref. pane to set it up so that you personalize when to ask...never, if an unread message is open, if a chat is open, or always.
Code: Select all
bool catfishagree=false;
while(hot == bloated)
{
catfishagree=true;
};Well, some of us don't log everything...someone wrote:After all it's all logged.
I would go for (2) - definitely not (3); I would like to be prompted, if I have a conversation open, since I usually close before quitting anyway; it would be a pain to always be prompted.
naib.webhop.org | PGP: 0xEC479127
No need for ";" after the "}" of the while loopTheSilverFox06 wrote:Catfish_Man wrote:For values of "hot" equal to "bloated", yes, I agree.Rita wrote: Of course, what would be really hot (and probably a pain in the butt to create) is one with a default to always ask, an option to turn it off, and an advanced pref. pane to set it up so that you personalize when to ask...never, if an unread message is open, if a chat is open, or always.Tell me if my syntax is wrong, it's been a while.Code: Select all
bool catfishagree=false; while(hot == bloated) { catfishagree=true; };
- zaudragon
- Growl Team
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 5:05 am
- Location: Kensington, CA, USA
- Contact:
ofri wrote:No need for ";" after the "}" of the while loopTheSilverFox06 wrote:Tell me if my syntax is wrong, it's been a while.Code: Select all
bool catfishagree=false; while(hot == bloated) { catfishagree=true; };
Code: Select all
(BOOL) catfishAgree = NO;
while(hot == bloated) {
catfishAgree = YES;
}Just trying to add a bit of humor. Your solution is actually fairly elegant if you really think about it, however, I find myself reluctant to deviate from "apple-q".The_Tick wrote:Who cares?jdang wrote:Blasphemy! "apple-q" is historic, no?The_Tick wrote:Why not setup keyboard prefs to make shift+cmd+q the quit combo for all apps?
Don't front, you know you sweat the alligator too.