I believe this is at least partially intentional and partially an implicit commentary.Zeremus X wrote:This thread went from discussing the release date of Adium 1.0 to dancing bannanas. Only on cocoaforge!
1.0 release date?
Try my software!
#define ADIUMX pimp //by me
#define QUESTION ((2b) || (!2b))
Have you hugged a programmer today?
#define ADIUMX pimp //by me
#define QUESTION ((2b) || (!2b))
Have you hugged a programmer today?
Here comes a slightly futile attempt to drag things back on topic. 
Putting aside the idea of projected release dates etc. It would still be nice to know what's going on with 1.0, things like what news features are in there and how it's all going.
Short of trawling through Trac it's hard to keep tabs on what's happening in development land. Perhaps some kind of weekly update in the blog that just summarises what's been happening and what areas people can help out in?
Putting aside the idea of projected release dates etc. It would still be nice to know what's going on with 1.0, things like what news features are in there and how it's all going.
Short of trawling through Trac it's hard to keep tabs on what's happening in development land. Perhaps some kind of weekly update in the blog that just summarises what's been happening and what areas people can help out in?
It would read like this:SeaWolf wrote:Here comes a slightly futile attempt to drag things back on topic.
Putting aside the idea of projected release dates etc. It would still be nice to know what's going on with 1.0, things like what news features are in there and how it's all going.
Short of trawling through Trac it's hard to keep tabs on what's happening in development land. Perhaps some kind of weekly update in the blog that just summarises what's been happening and what areas people can help out in?
svn broken
we're working on it
we're all busy
goto 10
- Catfish_Man
- Cocoaforge Admin
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:30 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- Contact:
Not quite *that* bad. I mean, I could say that I successfully sent and received files on AIM today.The_Tick wrote:It would read like this:SeaWolf wrote:Here comes a slightly futile attempt to drag things back on topic.
Putting aside the idea of projected release dates etc. It would still be nice to know what's going on with 1.0, things like what news features are in there and how it's all going.
Short of trawling through Trac it's hard to keep tabs on what's happening in development land. Perhaps some kind of weekly update in the blog that just summarises what's been happening and what areas people can help out in?
svn broken
we're working on it
we're all busy
goto 10
<edit> joscar branch, not trunk. Just to make sure I don't get a flood of "I'm using 1.0svn and it doesn't work for meee!" </edit>
Last edited by Catfish_Man on Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
True dat.Catfish_Man wrote:Not quite *that* bad. I mean, I could say that I successfully sent and received files on AIM today.The_Tick wrote:It would read like this:SeaWolf wrote:Here comes a slightly futile attempt to drag things back on topic.
Putting aside the idea of projected release dates etc. It would still be nice to know what's going on with 1.0, things like what news features are in there and how it's all going.
Short of trawling through Trac it's hard to keep tabs on what's happening in development land. Perhaps some kind of weekly update in the blog that just summarises what's been happening and what areas people can help out in?
svn broken
we're working on it
we're all busy
goto 10
- Catfish_Man
- Cocoaforge Admin
- Posts: 1203
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:30 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
- Contact:
- Damienoneill
- Frappa
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: University of Kent
Is 1.0 on a different codebase to that of 0.89?
What I am asking is are we seeing the features of 1.0 slowly introduced in 0.X upgrades so that when 1.0 arrives most of the 'new' features will be previously introduced?
Or will 1.0 be a massive update from what ever came before? Is it a new codebase, are features being held until the 1.0 release?
What I am asking is are we seeing the features of 1.0 slowly introduced in 0.X upgrades so that when 1.0 arrives most of the 'new' features will be previously introduced?
Or will 1.0 be a massive update from what ever came before? Is it a new codebase, are features being held until the 1.0 release?
The real answer is somewhat of both.
The "main line" of development is 1.0. The 0.8x series of releases was based on a branch (a "split" of the code). Some features have been merged back into the 0.8x branch, some not. 1.0 has code which is fundamentally different from (and thus incompatible with) the 0.8x series. When possible, merges have generally taken place. However, sometimes (due to large rewrites or reliance on previous, non-merged changes), things just can't be merged. So they are in 1.0.
The less technical answer is basically that 1.0 will have a lot of cool stuff. Currently, the 0.8x tree is only for bug fixes and improvements, so in a sense, features are being "held" for 1.0. However, porting them back to 0.8x isn't a very good use of time or resources.
Hope that clears things up.
The "main line" of development is 1.0. The 0.8x series of releases was based on a branch (a "split" of the code). Some features have been merged back into the 0.8x branch, some not. 1.0 has code which is fundamentally different from (and thus incompatible with) the 0.8x series. When possible, merges have generally taken place. However, sometimes (due to large rewrites or reliance on previous, non-merged changes), things just can't be merged. So they are in 1.0.
The less technical answer is basically that 1.0 will have a lot of cool stuff. Currently, the 0.8x tree is only for bug fixes and improvements, so in a sense, features are being "held" for 1.0. However, porting them back to 0.8x isn't a very good use of time or resources.
Hope that clears things up.
- Damienoneill
- Frappa
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: University of Kent
I think we still need to discuss this, but basically no more feature based releases until 1.0 is a good rule of thumb.Damienoneill wrote:Yep!
I was just hoping that 1.0 would be a big difference to what we have know instead of a slow thing so that we would nardly notice the jump.
Theres no 0.90 right? So are we on the last version of Adium until 1.0
Ya know, I was thinking this very same thing yesterday as I was poring through SVN. Go figure.Damienoneill wrote:What I am asking is are we seeing the features of 1.0 slowly introduced in 0.X upgrades so that when 1.0 arrives most of the 'new' features will be previously introduced?
Last edited by John Don on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm... kinda tired... I think I'll go home now.
-Forrest Gump
I'm an Adiumite!
-Forrest Gump
I'm an Adiumite!
- Damienoneill
- Frappa
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: University of Kent
I think the word you are looking for is poring - unless you are pouring milk.John Don wrote:Ya know, I was thinking this very same thing yesterday as I was pouring through SVN. Go figure.Damienoneill wrote:What I am asking is are we seeing the features of 1.0 slowly introduced in 0.X upgrades so that when 1.0 arrives most of the 'new' features will be previously introduced?
(Sorry, compulsive spelling correction.
Annoying little frog
"Also, I can kill you with my brain."
"Also, I can kill you with my brain."
- prometheas
- Harmless
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:43 pm
Who needs 1.0?
Eagerly though I may look forward to any and all feature enhancements in Adium, it's already the baddest thing in or out of the sun. Why so itchy for 1.0? What does it really mean to be 1.0 anyhow?
Maybe I'm just defensive coz I'm turning 30 in a couple months...?
Maybe I'm just defensive coz I'm turning 30 in a couple months...?
MacMom wrote:I think the word you are looking for is poring - unless you are pouring milk.John Don wrote:Ya know, I was thinking this very same thing yesterday as I was pouring through SVN. Go figure.Damienoneill wrote:What I am asking is are we seeing the features of 1.0 slowly introduced in 0.X upgrades so that when 1.0 arrives most of the 'new' features will be previously introduced?
(Sorry, compulsive spelling correction.)
*Fixed* hehe
I'm... kinda tired... I think I'll go home now.
-Forrest Gump
I'm an Adiumite!
-Forrest Gump
I'm an Adiumite!
